Fifty years ago, in July 1969, NASA put Apollo 11’s lunar module called the Eagle, and human footprints, on the moon. The moon is an average of 238,855 miles from earth. Mars, depending on its orbital time, fluctuates between 34 million to 62 million miles from earth.
 
Because Mars is the closest planet to Earthlings and has such deep fictional meaning from the earliest of observers – it’s become a focal technological challenge for wealthy businesses. But, as you know, we’re living a science Revolution and with an existential threat of losing the earth through human enterprise. Mars travel only sounds exotic. Staring at the moon provides a feeling of peace which we all long for. Scientists here on earth, specifically geneticists, if they’re firmly evolutionists, are thinking about re-engineering DNA that would enable humans to survive in increasing environmental chaos facing our planet. Talk about a long-shot!
 
I have a new idea. We have rockets, fuel, data, historical research from previous space journeys, nuclear energy, mammoth telescopes and satellites, very smart astronomers, astrophysicists, quantum computers and all that – but we are still stuck on earth.
 
Let’s put it all together, think counter-intuitively and move the moon to exist at least ½ the distance from Mother Earth. That’s right, move the Moon to relatively 119,427 miles from earth. That way, we don’t have to re-engineer human’s DNA which sounds much harder, even divine. We should plan now. We’re technologists, inventors, doers with imaginative powers. The Chinese are exploring the dark side, the USA has been on the bright side, the International Space Station is circling earth. But we’re still stuck on a warming earth.
 
Scientists warn us we need an alt-planet. Could it be the answer is staring back at us each night?  Move the moon closer to earth so we can inhabit it.  We are living in times of scientific Revolution – so give us a damn good Revolution!

Robert Waters, 2019
​really more unreal blog

 From: The Prophetic Backbone - eBook
A 1950’s car owner did not share his car with friends or with an opt-in community, but smart products are implicit about enabling a pathway toward social ascension, intelligence and the perception of changing one’s genetics. What does this have to do with sharing? The behavior of marketing is about marketing behaviors, whether we're reading about autonomous cars or wearable tech: buyers can share highly personal metrics. And more; he can do this in community. A notable paradigm shift has occurred in advertising’s two bedrock behavioral toolkits; sociology and psychology, now superseded by psycho-neurology and challenged by genetics.
Social behaviors are challenging to quantify for marketers; that is, to apply finite numbers on immeasurable behavioral patterns and hundreds of subjective feeling orientations. Does it feel like we're in the age of the brain economy? 
Have I failed in stating the obvious?  Technologists creating the digital future are sold-out on behavioral replication through AI; AI being the lead technology for re-creating cognitions or patterns of learning, and memorization. Ah, but the false assumption: tech firms understand human conscience. And, better than in healthcare professions. But I must be cautious; they don't  really profess superior wisdom about human nature, it's their artificial intelligent software written by them making humans "shareable." Our cars, our homes, our mobility, our health, education, employment, our genomes.  Humanity has become exactly what the first scientists in AI from the 1960's-70's proclaimed we were: general information systems. Today, the tech prophets' personal triumphs will be nothing short of total human genomic re-engineering. 
All aspirations have adversaries. The battle is on to preserve the human race by trying to create a new one. Are we that "shareable?"
Robert Waters
author: the prophetic backbone, an eBook coming soon.